Can the vegetation structure and composition in urban green spaces determine diversity of green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)?

Abstract

Green spaces represent the only natural areas in several cities around the world, providing good shelters for the local fauna. Based on this premise, many ecological studies have been conducted focused on these areas. Most of these works are about insects, particularly butterflies and beetles. Our study is centered on a different group: green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). These insects exhibit a similar feeding behavior to some other groups, such as beetles. We estimated diversity, richness, distribution, abundance and similarity employing two methods: sweep netting and suction trapping. Also, oviposition hosts were identified in 20 different green spaces. Approximately 740 specimens were collected representing 15 species in five genera. Seven species are new state records for Yucatán, Mexico. We identified about 300 species of plants, if which 75 are considered ovipositional associated hosts. Our work is the first of its kind, employing green lacewings in an urban ecological model and additionally providing new information about chrysopids in South Mexico. We encourage the conduct of similar studies not only in Mexico but also in other Central and South American countries.

References (76)

• L, Markó V, Vas J. 2003. Investigations on a neuropteroid community by using different methods. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 38: 199–207.
• Agnew CW. 1983. Mounting and preserving Neuroptera for scientific study. Entomological News 94: 205–212.
• Aguilera G, Ekroos J, Persson AS, Pettersson LB, Öckinger E. 2019. Intensive management reduces butterfly diversity over time in urban green spaces. Urban Ecosystems 22: 335.
• Aronson MF, La Sorte FA, Nilon CH, Katti M, Goddard MA, Lepczyk CA, Warren P, Williams N, Cilliers S, Clarkson B, Dobbs C, Dolan R, Hedblom M, Klotz S, Kooijmans JL, Kühn I, MacGregor-Fors I, McDonnell M, Mörtberg U, Pyšek P, Siebert S, Sushinsky J, Werner P, Winter M. 2014. A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281: 1–8.
• Ayala-Arcipreste ME. 2001. La apicultura de la Península de Yucatán un acercamiento desde la ecología humana. M.Sc. Thesis, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro de Investigación y estudios avanzados Press. Available at http://bibliotecasibe.ecosur.mx/sibe/book/000028703ecosur.mx/sibe/book/000028703(Last accessed March 20, 2019.)
• Ayuntamiento de Mérida. 2018. Sistema de gestión de espacios públicos. Available at http://isla.Mérida.gob.mx/serviciosinternet/ordenamientoterritorial/docs/SistemaGestion.pdf.(Last accessed November 19, 2023.)
• Banaszak-Cibicka W, Ratyńska H, Dylewski L. 2016. Features of urban green space favourable for large and diverse bee populations (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Apiformes). Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 20: 448–452.
• Banks N. 1945. A review of the Chrysopidae (Nothochrysinae) of Central America. Psyche 52: 139–174.
• Banks N. 1948. Chrysopidae (Nothochrysidae) collected in México by Dr. A. Dampf (Neuroptera). Psyche 55: 151–177.
• Barrientos R, Leirana J, Navarro J. 2016. Métodos gráficos para la exploración de patrones de diversidad en Ecología. Bioagrociencias 9: 11–18.
• Blair RB. 2001. Birds and butterflies along urban gradients in two ecoregions of the United States: Is urbanization creating a homogeneous fauna? p. 33–56. In: Lockwood JL, McKinney ML (eds.). Biotic homogenization. Springer; NY. 299 p
• Brooks SJ, Barnard PC. 1990. The green lacewings of the world: a generic review (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Entomology 59: 117–286.
• Brown KS, Freitas AVL. 2002. Butterfly communities of urban forest fragments in Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil: structure, instability, environmental correlates, and conservation. Journal of Insect Conservation 6: 217–231.
• Brown KS, Hutchings RW. 1997. Disturbance, fragmentation, and the dynamics of diversity in Amazonian forest butterflies. p. 91–110. In: Laurance WF, Bierregaard RO Jr. (eds.). Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. University of Chicago Press; Chicago, IL. 616 p
• Cancino-López RJ, Contreras-Ramos A. 2019. A new species of Ceraeochrysa Adams (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae), with a key to the species from Mexico. ZooKeys 888: 95–104.