Abstract

Green spaces represent the only natural areas in several cities around the world, providing good shelters for the local fauna. Based on this premise, many ecological studies have been conducted focused on these areas. Most of these works are about insects, particularly butterflies and beetles. Our study is centered on a different group: green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). These insects exhibit a similar feeding behavior to some other groups, such as beetles. We estimated diversity, richness, distribution, abundance and similarity employing two methods: sweep netting and suction trapping. Also, oviposition hosts were identified in 20 different green spaces. Approximately 740 specimens were collected representing 15 species in five genera. Seven species are new state records for Yucatán, Mexico. We identified about 300 species of plants, if which 75 are considered ovipositional associated hosts. Our work is the first of its kind, employing green lacewings in an urban ecological model and additionally providing new information about chrysopids in South Mexico. We encourage the conduct of similar studies not only in Mexico but also in other Central and South American countries.

References

• L, Markó V, Vas J. 2003. Investigations on a neuropteroid community by using different methods. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 38: 199–207.  
• Agnew CW. 1983. Mounting and preserving Neuroptera for scientific study. Entomological News 94: 205–212.  
• Aguilera G, Ekroos J, Persson AS, Pettersson LB, Öckinger E. 2019. Intensive management reduces butterfly diversity over time in urban green spaces. Urban Ecosystems 22: 335.  
• Aronson MF, La Sorte FA, Nilon CH, Katti M, Goddard MA, Lepczyk CA, Warren P, Williams N, Cilliers S, Clarkson B, Dobbs C, Dolan R, Hedblom M, Klotz S, Kooijmans JL, Kühn I, MacGregor-Fors I, McDonnell M, Mörtberg U, Pyšek P, Siebert S, Sushinsky J, Werner P, Winter M. 2014. A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281: 1–8.  
• Ayala-Arcipreste ME. 2001. La apicultura de la Península de Yucatán un acercamiento desde la ecología humana. M.Sc. Thesis, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro de Investigación y estudios avanzados Press. Available at http://bibliotecasibe.ecosur.mx/sibe/book/000028703ecosur.mx/sibe/book/000028703  (Last accessed March 20, 2019.)
• Ayuntamiento de Mérida. 2018. Sistema de gestión de espacios públicos. Available at http://isla.Mérida.gob.mx/serviciosinternet/ordenamientoterritorial/docs/SistemaGestion.pdf.  (Last accessed November 19, 2023.)
• Banaszak-Cibicka W, Ratyńska H, Dylewski L. 2016. Features of urban green space favourable for large and diverse bee populations (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Apiformes). Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 20: 448–452.  
• Banks N. 1945. A review of the Chrysopidae (Nothochrysinae) of Central America. Psyche 52: 139–174.  
• Banks N. 1948. Chrysopidae (Nothochrysidae) collected in México by Dr. A. Dampf (Neuroptera). Psyche 55: 151–177.  
• Barrientos R, Leirana J, Navarro J. 2016. Métodos gráficos para la exploración de patrones de diversidad en Ecología. Bioagrociencias 9: 11–18.  
• Blair RB. 2001. Birds and butterflies along urban gradients in two ecoregions of the United States: Is urbanization creating a homogeneous fauna? p. 33–56. In: Lockwood JL, McKinney ML (eds.). Biotic homogenization. Springer; NY. 299 p 
• Brooks SJ, Barnard PC. 1990. The green lacewings of the world: a generic review (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Entomology 59: 117–286.  
• Brown KS, Freitas AVL. 2002. Butterfly communities of urban forest fragments in Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil: structure, instability, environmental correlates, and conservation. Journal of Insect Conservation 6: 217–231.  
• Brown KS, Hutchings RW. 1997. Disturbance, fragmentation, and the dynamics of diversity in Amazonian forest butterflies. p. 91–110. In: Laurance WF, Bierregaard RO Jr. (eds.). Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. University of Chicago Press; Chicago, IL. 616 p 
• Cancino-López RJ, Contreras-Ramos A. 2019. A new species of Ceraeochrysa Adams (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae), with a key to the species from Mexico. ZooKeys 888: 95–104.  
• Carnevali G, Tapia-Muñoz JL, de Stefano RD, Morillo IR. 2010. Flora ilustrada de la península de Yucatán: listado florístico. Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán; Mérida, Mexico. 326 p 
• Chávez-Zichinelli CA, MacGregor-Fors I, Rohana PT, Valdéz R, Romano MC, Schondube JE. 2010. Stress responses of the house sparrow (Passer domesticus) to different urban land uses. Landscape and Urban Planning 98: 183–189.  
• Chao A, Jost L. 2012. Coverage‐based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by completeness rather than size. Ecology 93: 2533–2547.  
• Clark TL, Messina FJ. 1998. Foraging behavior of lacewing larvae (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on plants with divergent architectures. Journal of Insect Behavior 11: 303–317.  
• CONAGUA (Comisión Nacional del Agua). 2015. Datos meteorológicos del Organismo de Cuenca: península de Yucatán. Mérida: Dirección técnica jefatura de proyecto de aguas superficiales y meteorología. Available at https://smn.conagua.gob.mx/es/climatologia/temperaturas-y-lluvias/resumenes-mensuales-de-temperaturas-y-lluvias  (Last accessed March 10, 2019.)
• Contreras MGL, Argumedo JJ. 2012. Identificación de enemigos naturales de Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) en el estado de Yucatán, México. Fitosanidad 16(1): 5–11.  
• Contreras-Ramos A, Rosas MV. 2014. Biodiversidad de Neuroptera en México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 85: S264–S270.  
• Cortez-Mondaca E, Lugo-Angulo NE, Pérez-Márquez J, Apodaca-Sánchez MA. 2001. Primer reporte de enemigos naturales y parasitismo sobre Diaphorina citri Kuwayama en Sinaloa, México. Revista Científica UDO Agrícola, 11: 97–103.  
• De Freitas S, Penny ND. 2001. The green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) of Brazilian agro-ecosystems. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 52: 245–395.  
• De Freitas S, Penny ND, Adams PA. 2009. A revision of the New World genus Ceraeochrysa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 60: 503.  
• Deloya C, Ordoñez-Resendiz MM. 2008. Escarabajos (Insecta: Coleoptera). p. 123–134. In: Manson RH, Hernández-Ortiz V, Gallina S, Mehltreter K (eds.). Agroecosistemas cafeteros de Veracruz: Biodiversidad, manejo y conservación. Instituto de Ecología A.C. (INECOL); Veracruz, Mexico. 330 p 
• Devetak D, Klokočovnik V. 2016. The feeding biology of adult lacewings (Neuroptera): a review. Trends in Entomology 12: 29–42.  
• Garzón A, Medina P, Amor F, Viñuela E, Budia F. 2015. Toxicity and sublethal effects of six insecticides to last instar larvae and adults of the biocontrol agents Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) and Adalia bipunctata (L.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Chemosphere 132: 87–93.  
• Garzón‐Orduña IJ, Winterton SL, Jiang Y, Breitkreuz LC, Duelli P, Engel MS, Liu X. 2019. Evolution of green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): a molecular supermatrix approach. Systematic Entomology 44: 499–513.  
• Hammer O, Harper DA, Ryan PD. 2001. Palaeontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica. 4: 1–9.  
• Herbario-CICY. 2010. Flora de la Península de Yucatán. Available at http://www.cicy.mx/sitios/flora%20digital/  (Last accessed March 20, 2019.)
• Hsieh TC, Ma KH, Chao A. 2016. iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (H ill numbers). Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7: 1451–1456.  
• Jiménez-Osornio JJ, Ruenes-Morales MR, Montañez-Escalante P. 1999. Agrodiversidad de los solares de la Península de Yucatán. Red, Gestión de Recursos Naturales 14: 30–40.  
• Koh LP, Sodhi NS. 2004. Importance of reserves, fragments, and parks for butterfly conservation in a tropical urban landscape. Ecological Applications 14: 1695–1708.  
• Koczor S, Szentkirályi F, Tóth M. 2019. New perspectives for simultaneous attraction of Chrysoperla and Chrysopa lacewing species for enhanced biological control (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Scientific reports. 9: 1–6.  
• Lassau SA, Hochuli DF. 2004. Effects of habitat complexity on ant assemblages. Ecography 27: 157–164.  
• López-Arroyo JI. 2001. Depredadores de áfidos asociados a los cítricos en Nuevo León, México. Abstrac E-153. In: Sociedad Mexicana de Entomología. Memorias XXXVI Congreso Nacional de Entomología y XXVIII Congreso Nacional de Fitopatología; Querétaro, México. 
• López-Arroyo JI, Cortez-Mondaca E, Arredondo-Bernal HC, Ramírez-Delgado M, Loera-Gallardo J, Mellín-Rosas MA. 2007. Uso de artrópodos depredadores para el control biológico de plagas en México. p. 90–105. In: Rodríguez-Del Bosque LA, Arredondo-Bernal HC. (eds.). Teoría y aplicación del control biológico. Sociedad Mexicana de Control Biológico; Mexico City, Mexico. 303 p 
• López-Arroyo JI, De León T. 2002. Producción de Ceraeochrysa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) In: Arredondo-Bernal HC, Pérez-Serrato P, Mellín-Rosas MA (eds.). Control biológico del pulgón café de los cítricos, Toxoptera citricida, vector del virus de la tristeza de los cítricos. 3ra. ed. SAGARPA. Comisión Nacional de Sanidad Agropecuaria; Mérida, Mexico. 149 p 
• Lozano-Contreras MG, Jasso-Argumedo J. 2013. Identificación de enemigos naturales de Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) en el estado de Yucatán, México. Fitosanidad. 16: 5–11.  
• Mata L, Threlfall CG, Williams NS, Hahs AK, Malipatil M, Stork NE, Livesley SJ. 2017. Conserving herbivorous and predatory insects in urban green spaces. Scientific Reports 7: 1–12.  
• McKinney ML. 2002. Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation: The impacts of urbanization on native species are poorly studied, but educating a highly urbanized human population about these impacts can greatly improve species conservation in all ecosystems. BioScience 52: 883–890.  
• Missouri Botanical Garden. 2022. Tropicos. Available at http://legacy.tropicos.org/Home.aspx  (Last accessed February 16, 2022.)
• Mochizuki A, Naka H, Hamasaki K, Mitsunaga T. 2006. Larval cannibalism and intraguild predation between the introduced green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea, and the indigenous trash-carrying green lacewing, Mallada desjardinsi (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), as a case study of potential nontarget effect assessment. Environmental Entomology, 35: 1298–1303.  
• Nair IJ, Sharma S, Kaur R. 2020. Efficacy of the green lace wing, Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi (Esben-Peterson)(Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), against sucking pests of tomato: an appraisal under protected conditions. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control 30: 1–6.  
• Niemelä J. 2014. Ecology of urban green spaces: The way forward in answering major research questions. Landscape and Urban Planning 125: 298–303.  
• Oliveira IF, Lion MB, Cardoso MZ. 2018. A plaza too far: High contrast in butterfly biodiversity patterns between plazas and an urban reserve in Brazil. Landscape and Urban Planning 180: 207–216.  
• Orellana R, Carrillo L, Franco V. 2007. Árboles recomendables para las ciudades de la Península de Yucatán. Unidad de Recursos Naturales, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, AC; Mérida, Mexico. 78 p 
• Oswald JD. 2023. Neuropterida Species of the World. Available at https://lacewing.tamu.edu/SpeciesCatalog/Main  (Last accessed November 3, 2023.)
• Patiño-Arellano SA. 2012. Complejo de áfidos y riesgo de dispersión del virus de la tristeza de los cítricos en la península de Yucatán. M.Sc. Thesis Colegio de Posgraduados Press.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.1.1671.8969 
• Penny ND, Tauber CA, De León T. 2000. A new species of Chrysopa from western North America with a key to North American species (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 93: 776–784.  
• Ramirez-Restrepo LR, Chacon De Ulloa P, Constantino LM. 2007. Diversity of diurnal butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea) in Santiago de Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Entomología 33: 54–63.  
• Ramirez-Restrepo LR, Halffter G. 2013. Butterfly diversity in a regional urbanization mosaic in two Mexican cities. Landscape and Urban Planning 115: 39–48.  
• Ramírez-Restrepo LR, MacGregor-Fors I. 2017. Butterflies in the city: a review of urban diurnal Lepidoptera. Urban Ecosystems 20: 171–182.  
• Raupp MJ, Shrewsbury PM, Herms DA. 2010. Ecology of herbivorous arthropods in urban landscapes. Annual Review of Entomology 55: 19–38.  
• Salazar R. 1991. Guácimo Guzuma ulmifolia Lam., Especie de Árbol de Uso Múltiple en América Central. Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza. CATIE. Serie Técnica. Informe Técnico 165: 1–69.  
• Sandoval-Gío JJ, Sánchez-Castillo LE, Zarza-Meza EA, Hernández-Jiménez JM, Fernández-Serrano JH, Pineda-Doporto A. 2018. Toxicidad aguda diferencial de TALSTAR® (bifentrina) y BIOTHRINE® (deltametrina) en la tilapia nilótica Oreochromis niloticus. Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental 34: 45–55.  
• Sing KW, Luo J, Wang W, Jaturas N, Soga M, Yang X, Dong H, Wilson JJ. 2019. Ring roads and urban biodiversity: distribution of butterflies in urban parks in Beijing city and correlations with other indicator species. Scientific Reports 9: 7653.  
• Soto-Pinto L, Schroth G, Laderach P, Dempewolf J. 2010. Adaptación al cambio climático y sistemas productivos. p.193– 199. In: Fletes OHB (ed.). Pequeños productores y vulnerabilidad global agroalimentaria. Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas Red de Investigación Socioeconómica en Hortalizas, Frutas y Flores (RISHORT); Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Mexico. 385 p 
• Stange LA. 2000. The green lacewings of Florida: (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). 1. Genera. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry, Entomology Circular 400: 1–4.  
• Tarango-Rivero SH, García-Nevárez G, Burrola-Morales JR. 2013. Manejo de áfidos del nogal pecanero. INIFAP Folleto Técnico 33: 1–42.  
• Tauber CA. 2003. Generic characteristics of Chrysopodes (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), with new larval descriptions and a review of species from the United States and Canada. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 96: 472–490.  
• Tauber CA. 2004. A systematic review of the genus Leucochrysa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) in the United States. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 97: 1129–1158.  
• Tauber CA, De León T. 2001. Systematics of green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): larvae of Ceraeochrysa from México. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 94: 197–209.  
• Tauber CA, De León T, Penny ND, Tauber MJ. 2000. The genus Ceraeochrysa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) of America north of México: larvae, adults, and comparative biology. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 93: 1195–1221.  
• Tauber CA, Tauber MJ, Albuquerque GS. 2001. Plesiochrysa brasiliensis (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): larval stages, biology, and taxonomic relationships. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 94: 858–865.  
• Thierry D, Canard M. 2007. The biodiversity of green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) in a mosaic ecosystem in southern France. Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Ferrara 8: 131–138.  
• Trouvé C, Thierry D, Canard M. 2002. Preliminary survey of the lacewings (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae, Hemerobiidae) in agroecosytems in Northern France, with phenological notes. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 48: 359–369.  
• Ullah Z, Sabri MA, Ahmad S, Bilal H, Hussain D, Mughal TK, Mohsin M, Aftab A, Ahmad MI. 2017. In vitro study of comparative toxicity of different insecticides against Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 5: 697–702.  
• Uno S, Cotton J, Philpott SM. 2010. Diversity, abundance, and species composition of ants in urban green spaces. Urban Ecosystems 13: 425–441.  
• Valencia-Luna LA, Romero-Nápoles J, Valdez-Carrasco J, Carrillo-Sánchez JL, López-Martínez V. 2006. Taxonomía y registros de Chrysopidae (Insecta: Neuroptera) en el Estado de Morelos, México. Acta Zoológica Mexicana 22: 17–61.  
• Heezik Y, Dickinson KJM, Freeman C, Porter S, Wing J, Barratt BIP. 2016. To what extent does vegetation composition and structure influence beetle communities and species richness in private gardens in New Zealand? Landscape and Urban Planning 151: 79–88.  
• Villenave J, Deutsch B, Lodé T, Rat-Morris E. 2006. Pollen preference of the Chrysoperla species (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) occurring in the crop environment in western France. European Journal of Entomology 103: 771–777.  
• Whittaker RH. 1965. Dominance and diversity in land plant communities: numerical relations of species express the importance of competition in community function and evolution. Science 147: 250–260.  
• Ye J, Li J, Li Z, Han S. 2017. Rearing of Mallada basalis (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on modified artificial diets. PLoS ONE 12(9): 1–9.  
• Zuur A, Ieno E, Smith G. 2007. Analyzing ecological data. Springer; NY. 672 p