Riodinid butterfly fauna (Lepidoptera) of the Cosñipata Region, Peru: Annotated checklist, community structure, and contrast with Lycaenidae

Abstract

A team of experienced lepidopterists sampled the butterfly fauna of Peru’s Cosñipata Region from 400 to 4,000 m elevation for more than a decade (7,440 field person-hours) and supplemented this sample with data from museum specimens and the scientific literature. An annotated checklist of Cosñipata Riodinidae (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) documents 398 species, which represents 29% of the world Riodinidae fauna. For each, it lists sample abundance, adult behavior, elevation, and temporal distribution. In the fieldwork sample, 75 species (20.9%) were sampled once and 39 (9.8%) were not encountered (collected or imaged by others). A riodinid species of median abundance was sampled an average of once every 826 field person-hours. Sampled sex ratios were 81.2% male, but were not statistically higher in species in which male perching behavior was observed. We document examples of conspicuous geographic variation in the time of male perching behavior. Species richness is greatest at low elevation and at the transition between the dry and wet seasons. There is little evidence that the community is composed of species restricted to narrow elevational bands or restricted in the adult stage to a single season. Compared with Lycaenidae, Riodinidae are significantly more restricted to lowland habitats and were sampled 2.5 times as frequently with a mean number of individuals per species more than twice as great as that of Lycaenidae.

References (36)

• Adams MJ. 1985. Speciation in the pronophiline butterflies (Satyridae) of the northern Andes. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera. Supplement 1: 33–49.
• Brévignon C. 2008. Le groupe d’Euselasia euoras (Hewitson, [1855]) en Guyane française (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae, Euselasiinae). p. 44–61. In: Lacomme D, Manil L (eds.). Lépidoptères de Guyane. Tome 3. Rhopalocères 2. Association des Lépidoptéristes de France; Paris. 96 p
• Brévignon C, Gallard JY. 1995. Contribution a l’étude des Riodinidae de Guyane Française (Lepidoptera). Le genre Argyrogrammana Strand, 1932. Lambillionea 95(3): 393–406.
• Brown KS Jr. 2005. Geologic, evolutionary, and ecological bases of the diversification of Neotropical butterflies: Implications for conservation. p. 166–201. In: Bermingham EP, Dick CW, Moritz C (eds.). Tropical rainforests. Past, present & future. University of Chicago Press; Chicago. 672 p
• Brown KS Jr, Freitas AVL. 2000. Diversidade de Lepidoptera em Santa Teresa, Espírito Santo. Boletim do Museu de Biologia Mello Leitão (N.S.) 11/12: 71–116.
• Busby RC, Faynel C, Moser A, Robbins RK. 2017. Sympatric diversification in the Upper Amazon: A revision of the Eumaeine genus Paraspiculatus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 649: i–vii , 1–65.
• Callaghan CJ. 1983. A study of isolating mechanisms among Neotropical butterflies of the subfamily Riodininae. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 21(3): 159–176.
• Callaghan CJ, Lamas G. 2004. Riodinidae. p. 141–170. In: Lamas G (ed.). Checklist: Part 4A. Hesperioidea – Papilionoidea. In: Heppner JB (ed.). Atlas of Neotropical Lepidoptera. Volume 5A. Association for Tropical Lepidoptera. Scientific Publishers; Gainesville, FL. xxv + 439 p
• Chao A., Lee S. 1992. Estimating the number of classes via sample coverage. Journal of the American Statistical Association 87(417): 210–217.
• Chew FS, Robbins RK. 1984. Egg-laying in butterflies, p. 65–79. In: Vane-Wright RI, Ackery PR (eds.). The biology of butterflies. Academic Press; London. xxiv + 429 p
• Colwell RK, Lees DC. 2000. The mid-domain effect: geometric constraints on the geography of species richness. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15(2): 70–76.
• Cómbita JL, Giraldo CE, Escobar F. 2022. Environmental variation associated with topography explains butterfly diversity along a tropical elevation gradient. Biotropica 54(1): 146–156.
• D’Abrera B. 1994. Butterflies of the Neotropical Region. Part VI. Riodinidae. Hill House; Victoria, Black Rock: i–viii, 879– 1096.
• Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Isaac NJB, Roy DB, Hardy PB, Fox R, Asher J. 2006. The effects of visual apparency on bias in butterfly recording and monitoring. Biological Conservation 128(4): 486–492.
• Ehrlich PR. 1958. The comparative morphology, phylogeny and higher classification of the butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). University of Kansas Science Bulletin 39(8): 305–370.