Abstract

Analyses of whole genomic shotgun datasets, COI barcodes, morphology, and historical literature suggest that the following 13 butterfly species from the family Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) in Texas, USA are distinct from their closest named relatives and therefore are described as new (type localities are given in parenthesis): Spicauda atelis Grishin, new species (Hidalgo Co., Mission), Urbanus (Urbanus) rickardi Grishin, new species (Hidalgo Co., nr. Madero), Urbanus (Urbanus) oplerorum Grishin, new spe¬cies (Hidalgo Co., Mission/Madero), Telegonus tsongae Grishin, new species (Starr Co., Roma), Autochton caballo Grishin, new species (Hidalgo Co., 6 mi W of Hidalgo), Epargyreus fractigutta Grishin, new species (Hidalgo Co., McAllen), Aguna mcguirei Grishin, new species (Cameron Co., Brownsville), Polygonus par¬dus Grishin, new species (Hidalgo Co., McAllen), Arteurotia artistella Grishin, new species (Hidalgo Co., Mission), Heliopetes elonmuski Grishin, new species (Cameron Co., Boca Chica), Hesperia balcones Grishin, new species (Travis Co., Volente), Troyus fabulosus Grishin, new species (Hidalgo Co., Peñitas), and Le-rema ochrius Grishin, new species (Hidalgo Co., nr. Relampago). Most of these species are known in the US almost exclusively from the Lower Rio Grande Valley in Texas. Nine of the holotypes were collected in 1971-1975, a banner period for butterfly species newly recorded from the Rio Grande Valley of Texas; five of them collected by William W. McGuire, and one by Nadine M. McGuire. At the time, these new species have been recorded under the names of their close relatives. A Neotype is designated for Papilio fulminator Sepp, [1841] (Suriname). Lectotypes are designated for Goniurus teleus Hübner, 1821 (unknown, likely in South America), Goniloba azul Reakirt, [1867] (Mexico: Veracruz) and Eudamus misitra Plötz, 1881 (Mex-ico). Several taxonomic changes are proposed. The following taxa are species (not subspecies): Spicauda zalanthus (Plötz, 1880), reinstated status (not Spicauda teleus (Hübner, 1821)), Telegonus fulminator (Sepp, [1841]), reinstated status (not Telegonus fulgerator (Walch, 1775), Telegonus misitra (Plötz, 1881), reinstated status (not Telegonus azul (Reakirt, [1867])), Autochton reducta (Mabille and Boullet, 1919), new status (not Autochton potrillo (Lucas, 1857)), Epargyreus gaumeri Godman and Salvin, 1893, reinstated status (not Epargyreus clavicornis (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869)), and Polygonus punctus E. Bell and W. Comstock, 1948, new status (not Polygonus savigny (Latreille, [1824])). Urbanus ehakernae Burns, 2014 and Epargyreus socus chota Evans, 1952 are junior subjective synonyms of Urbanus alva Evans, 1952 and Epargyreus clavicornis (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869), respectively, and Epargyreus gaumeri tenda Evans, 1955, new combination is not a subspecies of E. clavicornis.

References

• Bordelon C. 2011. 2010 Season Summary: Zone 6 Texas. News of The Lepidopterists’ Society 53(Suppl. 1): 86–100. 
• Brower AVZ. 2010. Alleviating the taxonomic impediment of DNA barcoding and setting a bad precedent: names for ten species of ‘Astraptes fulgerator’ (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Eudaminae) with DNA-based diagnoses. Systematics and Biodiversity 8(4): 485–491. 
• Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. 2015. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nature Methods 12(1): 59–60. 
• Burns JM. 2000. Pyrgus communis and Pyrgus albescens (Hesperiidae: Pyrginae) are separate transcontinental species with variable but diagnostic valves. Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 54(2): 52–71. 
• Butler AG. 1870. Descriptions of some new diurnal Lepidoptera, chiefly Hesperiidae. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1870(4): 485–520. 
• Cong Q, Shen J, Zhang J, Li W, Kinch LN, Calhoun JV, Warren AD, Grishin NV. 2021. Genomics reveals the origins of historical specimens. Molecular Biology and Evolution 38(5): 2166–2176. 
• Cong Q, Zhang J, Grishin NV. 2019a. Genomic determinants of speciation. bioRxiv BIORXIV/2019/837666https://doi.org/10.1101/837666  (Last accessed January 2022.)
• Cong Q, Zhang J, Shen J, Grishin NV. 2019b. Fifty new genera of Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera). Insecta Mundi 0731: 1–56. 
• Queiroz K. 2005. Ernst Mayr and the modern concept of species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102(Suppl 1): 6600–6607. 
• Evans WH. 1937. A catalogue of the African Hesperiidae indicating the classification and nomenclature adopted in the British Museum. The Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History); London. xii + 212 p., 30 pls. 
• Evans WH. 1949. A catalogue of the Hesperiidae from Europe, Asia, and Australia in the British Museum (Natural History). The Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History); London. xix + 502 p., 53 pls. 
• Evans WH. 1951. A catalogue of the American Hesperiidae indicating the classification and nomenclature adopted in the British Museum (Natural History). Part I. Introduction and Group A Pyrrhopyginae. The Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History); London. x + 92 p., pls. 1–9 
• Evans WH. 1952. A catalogue of the American Hesperiidae indicating the classification and nomenclature adopted in the British Museum (Natural History). Part II. Pyrginae. Section I. The Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History); London. v + 178 p., pls. 10–25 
• Evans WH. 1953. A catalogue of the American Hesperiidae indicating the classification and nomenclature adopted in the British Museum (Natural History). Part III. Pyrginae. Section 2. The Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History); London. v + 246 p., pls. 26–53 
• Evans WH. 1955. A catalogue of the American Hesperiidae indicating the classification and nomenclature adopted in the British Museum (Natural History). Part IV. Hesperiinae and Megathyminae. The Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History); London. v + 499 p., pls. 54–88 
• Funk DJ, Omland KE. 2003. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34: 397–423. 
• Geneva AJ, Muirhead CA, Kingan SB, Garrigan D. 2015. A new method to scan genomes for introgression in a secondary contact model. PLoS One 10(4): e0118621. 
• Godman FD. 1907. Notes on the American species of Hesperiidae described by Plötz. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (7)20(16): 132–155. 
• Godman FD, Salvin O. 1893. Biologia Centrali-Americana. Insecta. Lepidoptera-Rhopalocera. Dulau & Co., Bernard Quaritch; London. 2(113): 313–328. 
• Harris K, Nielsen R. 2016. The genetic cost of neanderthal introgression. Genetics 203(2): 881–891. 
• Hebert PD, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270(1512): 313–321. 
• Hebert PD, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W. 2004. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101(41): 14812–14817. 
• Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. 2018. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35(2): 518–522. 
• Honey MR, Scoble MJ. 2001. Linnaeus’ butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 132(3): 277–399. 
• Hübner J. 1821. Index exoticorum lepidopterorum, in foliis 244 a Jacobo Hübner hactenus effigiatorum; adjectis denominationibus emendatis, tam communioribus quam exactioribus. Jacob Hübner; Augsburg. 7 p. Hübner J. [1808]. Sammlung exotischer Schmetterlinge. Vol. 1. Jacob Hübner; Augsburg. pl. [154] 
• Hudson RR, Slatkin M, Maddison WP. 1992. Estimation of levels of gene flow from DNA sequence data. Genetics 132(2): 583–589. 
• Naturalist. 2022. A Community for Naturalists – iNaturalist. Available at https://www.inaturalist.org  (Last accessed November 2, 2022.)
• Li W, Cong Q, Shen J, Zhang J, Hallwachs W, Janzen DH, Grishin NV. 2019. Genomes of skipper butterflies reveal extensive convergence of wing patterns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116(13): 6232–6237. 
• Linnaeus C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synomymis, locis. Editio Decima, reformata. Vol. 1. Laurentius Salvius; Stockholm. iv + 823 + [1] p 
• Lukhtanov VA, Sourakov A, Zakharov E. 2016. DNA barcodes as a tool in biodiversity research: testing pre-existing taxonomic hypotheses in Delphic Apollo butterflies (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae). Systematics and Biodiversity 14: 599–613. 
• Mabille P. 1904. Lepidoptera Rhopalocera. Fam. Hesperidae. Genera Insectorum 17c: 143–182. 
• Mallet J. 1995. A species definition for the modern synthesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10(7): 294–299. 
• Mallet J. 2020. Alternative views of biological species: reproductively isolated units or genotypic clusters? National Science Review 7(8): 1401–1407. 
• Mayr E. 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press; New York. xiv + 334 p 
• Mayr E. 1996. What is a species, and what is not? Philosophy of Science 63(2): 262–277. 
• McGuire WW, Rickard MA. 1976. New Hesperiidae records for Texas and the United States. Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 30(1): 5–11. 
• McKay BD, Zink RM. 2010. The causes of mitochondrial DNA gene tree paraphyly in birds. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 54(2): 647–650. 
• Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2015. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32(1): 268–274. 
• Pazhenkova EA, Lukhtanov VA. 2021. Genomic introgression from a distant congener in the Levant fritillary butterfly, Melitaea acentria. Molecular Ecology 30(19): 4819–4832. 
• Plötz C. 1881. Die Hesperiinen-Gattung Eudamus und ihre Arten. Stettiner entomologische Zeitung 42(10/12): 500–504. 
• Rambaut A. 2018. FigTree, version 1.4.4. Available at http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/  (Last accessed August 2022.)
• Ratnasingham S, Hebert PD. 2007. BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System (http://www.barcodinglife.org). Molecular Ecology Notes 7(3): 355–364. 
• Rickard MA. 2010. Kisutam syllis (Godman & Salvin, 1887) (Lycaenidae: Theclini) new to Texas and the United States. News of the Lepidopterists’ Society 52(4): 141. 
• Rickard MA, Grishin NV. 2010. Strymon serapio new for the U.S. (Lycaenidae: Theclinae). News of the Lepidopterists’ Society 52(3): 79–84. 
• Ross HA. 2014. The incidence of species-level paraphyly in animals: a re-assessment. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 76: 10–17. 
• Rubinoff D, Cameron S, Will K. 2006. A genomic perspective on the shortcomings of mitochondrial DNA for “barcoding” identification. Journal of Heredity 97(6): 581–594. 
• Shen J, Cong Q, Borek D, Otwinowski Z, Grishin NV. 2017. Complete genome of Achalarus lyciades, the first representative of the Eudaminae subfamily of skippers. Current Genomics 18(4): 366–374. 
• Spearing D. 1991. Roadside geology of Texas. Mountain Press Publishing Co.; Missoula, MT. 418 p 
• Sperling FAH. 2003. Butterfly molecular systematics: from species definitions to higher level phylogenies. p. 431–458. In: Boggs C, Erlich P, Watt W (eds.). Butterflies. Ecology and evolution taking flight. University of Chicago Press; Chicago. 756 p. 
• Steinhauser SR. 1981. Revision of the proteus group of the genus Urbanus Hubner (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Bulletin of the Allyn Museum 62: 1–41. 
• Stresemann E. 1954. Ferdinand Deppe’s travels in Mexico, 1824-1829. Condor 56(2): 86–92. 
• Vendetti JE, Garland R. 2019. Species name formation for zoologists: a pragmatic approach. Journal of Natural History 53(47–48): 2999–3018. 
• Zhang J, Cong Q, Lamas G, Grishin NV. 2022a. Neotype designation for Papilio fulgerator Walch, 1775 (Hesperiidae: Eudaminae). The Taxonomic Report of the International Lepidoptera Survey 10(8): 1–8. 
• Zhang J, Cong Q, Shen J, Brockmann E, Grishin NV. 2019. Genomes reveal drastic and recurrent phenotypic divergence in firetip skipper butterflies (Hesperiidae: Pyrrhopyginae). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 286(1903): 20190609. 
• Zhang J, Cong Q, Shen J, Grishin NV. 2022b. Taxonomic changes suggested by the genomic analysis of Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera). Insecta Mundi 0921: 1–135. 
• Boyer P, Guppy CS, Kohler S, Lamas G, Opler PA, Grishin NV. 2022c. Taxonomic discoveries enabled by genomic analysis of butterflies. The Taxonomic Report of the International Lepidoptera Survey 10(7): 1–59. 
• Zhang J, Cong Q, Shen J, Song L, Grishin NV. 2022d. Genomic DNA sequencing reveals two new North American species of Staphylus (Hesperiidae: Pyrginae: Carcharodini). The Taxonomic Report of the International Lepidoptera Survey 10(4): 1–13.